jump to navigation

Three kinds of online safety May 6, 2009

Posted by Malene Charlotte Larsen in Internet Safety, Talks, Youth.

During the past few weeks I have been giving a couple of public talks at different conferences in Denmark, all focusing on youth and digital media. Even though my talks usually don’t include many perspectives on online safety and focus more on communicating my research results and giving a general introduction to how Danish youth use social network sites, I know that many of the participants (often teachers, social educators, parents, librarians etc.) are interested in knowing how to teach kids about safety issues.

In this regard I recently read an interesting post from the NetFamilyNews blog. Here, Anne Collier offers three perspectives on online safety and internet literacy:

  • Physical safety – the one we have focused on the most, freedom from physical harm by predators and bullies
  • Psychological safety – freedom from cruelty, flaming, and other forms of harassment and cyberbullying involving ex-friends, mean kids, bullies, colleagues, etc. […]
  • Reputational and legal safety – these can overlap with the psychological kind, where, for example, online defamation can harm someone’s reputation; they provide for freedom from restriction or repercussion as a result of online communication or production by one’s self or others […].

She argues that US kids “have practically tuned out the term online safety” because of a strong focus in US society on the first perspective. The term “can’t really help them deal with the complexities of their online/offline social lives, it’s in danger of becoming irrelevant to them”, she writes. I agree very much with Collier and her point is quite similar to what I was trying to argue in this article on Nettendenser in December. I think it is important to focus not only on the threats and risks (and thereby treating children and young people as victims) in order to get them to listen to advice on online safety.

Read the post from NetFamilyNews here (which also includes many relevant links) .


1. SanMix - July 10, 2009

Teens nowadays are very up to date when it comes to technology. There are several social networking sites and there’s online games as well. Online games serves as a tool for a complete stranger to get in touch with their victims. As a parent, we need to educate our children as well and here’s a good article I wanna share: http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=1738346

2. Anne Collier - October 28, 2009

Malene, thanks so much for your post on this suggested taxonomy of Internet safety. We’ve since added a fourth, from my colleague Larry Magid: Identity, property, and community safety – freedom from theft of identity and property and from attacks against networks and online communities at local, national, and international levels. We put this in our new paper, “Online Safety 3.0: Empowering and Protecting Youth” (http://os3.connectsafely.org) – not realizing that the words empowerment and protection are being spoken in the same breath a lot in Europe (found that out last wk at Safer Internet Forum). Would love any comments you might have on OS3.

3. Cybersafety is the new Stranger Danger. Instead of banning SNS … « Youth Health 2.0 - August 1, 2010

[…] risky behaviours attributed to a still developing limbic system. For a good discussion click: Malene Larson’s blog. <a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Currently reading <?php the_permalink(); ?>" […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: